Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
J Genet ; 2020 Apr; 99: 1-3
Artigo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-215536

RESUMO

Karyotyping is one among the culling parameter used for taking up culling decisions. Cytogenetic screening of breeding bulls has been recommended to screen for chromosomal abnormalities before semen production in artificial insemination. The chromosomal analysis of a Holstein Friesian crossbred bull revealed the presence of acrocentric Y-chromosome, which was further confirmed by CBGbanding. The shape of the Y-chromosome determining that male line used for crossbreeding was from indigenous origin. Karyotyping is a best and reliable technique for the identification of crossbred calves born to the indigenous bulls.

2.
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-157237

RESUMO

An important reason for higher cervical cancer incidence in developing countries is lack of effective screening programs like pap smear, aimed at detecting precancerous conditions before they progress to invasive cancer. The potential difficulties in implementing cervical cytology based screening in low-resource settings have prompted the investigation of accuracy of alternative low technology tests such as Visual inspection with acetic acid application [VIA], Visual inspection with acetic acid application with magnification [VIAM], visual inspection on Lugol’s Iodine application [VILI] in early detection of cervical neoplasia .In our study we compared pap smear with VIA to study the accurarcy of VIA as it is simpler and easier technique to be used as screening in low resource settings. Aim: This is a hospital based descriptive, prospective study to evaluate validity of pap smear and VIA techniques as screening tests in identifying cervical lesions. Materials And Methods: After general and systemic examination as a routine,visual local pelvic examination including visualisation of cervix and vagina per speculum and the findings are documented in the proforma .Then VIA and pap smear are done in that order, if any of these tests are positive then cervical biopsy will be taken and further advise to the subject is given. Results: A total of 313 women were involved in the study. The sensitivity of pap smear is 54.5% specificity is 98.9% while that of VIA 95.4% and 97.9%respectively. We found that VIA accuracy was comparatively more than that of pap smear. Conclusion: In low resource settings, usefulness of VIA is more than that of pap smear. We suggest to perform VIA in all the women inspite of having pap smear facility to improve detection rate of cervical lesions and provide better patient councelling and treatment.

3.
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-157235

RESUMO

Introduction: Since 1981, several severity scores have been proposed for ICU patients. The first ones were acute physiology and chronic health evaluation(APACHE, APACHEII),Simplified acute physiology score (SAPS); later, mortality probability model(MPM) and APACHE III were introduced. The SAPS II scoring system, have been used as a method for converting the score to a probability of hospital mortality.The present prospective study is designed to predict the ICU outcome in medical ICU patients. Objective of the Study: To predict the mortality and morbidity of the patients admitted in ICU for various emergencies using SAPS II scoring system and correlate it with the outcome of the patient on discharge. Materials and Methods: The study prospective type, data was obtained from the patients admitted to ICU ,SAPS II scoring was given and were followed up till they got discharged to assess the outcome .Results:45 patients were studied the total mortality was 26.6%. The SAPS II Scores of the patients and the number of deaths in the different groups are given in table below. The chi-square value was 23.04, df= 6with a p + 0.0007 and this study is well within the p value of 0.05, hence it is significant which means the higher the score the more is the risk of morbidity and mortality, when score is >50 there is increased risk of morbidity and mortality, when score is >50 there is increased risk of mortality. Conclusion:The present study imposes on the following conclusions -SAPS II scoring is useful in predicting the ICU outcome of patients admitted in the ICU even when the primary diagnosis is not specified.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA